MAIN MENU

Return to the main menu for comics, games, articles and links to entertain your inner freethunk.

FREETHUNK BOOK!
The Complete Edition
By Jeff Swenson
160 pages, Jam-Packed
Purchase your collectable copy!


"JUGS, BEAVERS and EXPLODING BALLS"
by Jeff Swenson
First Cynic Comic Strip
collection now in print.
2004-2005

Buy it now for
below retail.



HIGH SPIRITS, TV SHOW
Review by Jeff Swenson

The other night I was looking through the selections on my On Demand service (since I hate commercials and there's never anything on that I want to see that is starting right when I sit down) and I came across a show called High Spirits, another import from the BBC. The BBC has always treated me well, entertaining me with gems such as Father Ted and The Vicar of Dibley so I'm always game to check out any new offerings. Even though I am an American I have what you call a "British Sense of Humor."

The premise of the show High Spirits is a psychic named Shirley Ghostman goes around doing what psychics do: readings, making predictions, talking to pets, holding contests for the next big psychic celebrity and channeling the dead. Shirley is not a woman, but rather an effeminate, psychic stereotype--the kind of man you think might be stereotypically gay but are not sure because as a heterosexual you're uncertain as to whether the stereotypes are true. Regardless, in the first episode we start with spooky mansion angled camera shots reminding us of ABC Family's Scariest Places or the Travel Channel's Most Haunted and hear Patrick Stewart's voice introducing Shirley. Patrick Stewart--Jean Luc Picard--taking a back seat to a ditzy psychic? You know something's up unless the former captain was assimilated by the Borg again.

The audience applauds as we go inside and Shirley comes out dressed like a TV evangelist in white with a bad hairdo. He begins to do readings to the audience and receives an indication from the spirits that someone in the audience has been hit or impacted by a hippo. Now you know something's up.

Shirley Ghostman of course is a comedian playing a psychic and spoofing all that we've come to know about psychics--poorly done cold readings, messing with people's personal lives, and buying into ridiculous reading techniques such as rumpology. But in this show the audience is not aware that Shirley Ghostman is a fraud, or rather playing a fraud as is my personal opinion of most psychics. When a woman in the audience is told that there is a picture in her house of an ugly woman with a piggish nose she realizes Shirley is talking about her and she has been in a psychic, roundabout way insulted. In several instances I saw audience members smiling when Shirley chose to give them a reading and when the reading was over their jaws dropped. They were expecting something positive, something meaningful, and instead Shirley gave them something dreadful or what felt like an unintentional insult.

And that's unfortunately why I can't recommend this show. It is painful to watch. The humor is based on embarrassment and humor that just isn't entertaining. Shirley Ghostman doesn't come off as funny, he comes off almost like a real psychic that you want to punch out. I felt bad for the people in the audience who were given a reading. Hopefully they'll learn from the experience. The audience did start to catch on after awhile, especially after Shirley channeled the spirit of Princess Diana. But amazingly some people did not. As "Diana" talked, the camera took one or two shots of people crying. Crying because they were hearing their beloved Diana speaking to them from beyond the grave, and also saying some rather horrid things about Camilla. Even with what was an obvious comedic hoax people were still wanting to believe that this was real.

At the end of the show when Shirley channels the spirit of Roy Orbison to sing a previously unpublished song, it looked like most of the audience "got it". That this was one big gag. I wonder how many in the audience did not.

The show is also interspersed with other exploits of Shirley and another odd identity that he plays, kind of a mentally deficient wannabe psychic, when he visits a rumpologist. Rumpology was not part of the comedy. It's an actual practice where people pay a psychic to read their ASS! As much as I didn't like this comedian, this rumpologist deserved all the ill treatment she got. Wake the hell up. When someone is telling your future based on your ASS it means your brain has been pooped out of it and flushed.

As far as I've read, Britain has far less religiosity than the USA, but the void has been filled in by psychic superstition to the point where it is considered religion itself. Thus the reason this comedian felt it would make a good show. I predict this show won't last long on BBC America. It has kind of an Mtv JackAss mentality that honestly isn't funny and if you're going to offend supernatural believers you're going to have to be especially clever. I can't stand psychics and I didn't like the show. So unless my sense of humor is not in step with modern times than that may be a pretty good indication that the show fails to amuse--it's more like a car wreck that you take a glance at and then speed up because you're holding up traffic. British humor is very different than American humor and I could be wrong, but being that I'm a big fan of British shows such as The Office and Ed vs Spencer I would guess that most American viewers will agree with me.


SUPPORTING CONTENT
Email Reaction to The Freethunk Review from a British Fan of the show:

I have to say your review of the BBC comedy show high
spirits was truly awful! IN FACT IT COULD BE THE WORST
PIECE OF WEB REVIEW NONSENSE I'VE EVER READ. You being
American, I would forgive you for not comprehending
the show as top rate comedy - British comedy being
more developed interlectually and, effectively better
quality than it's American counterparts - but how dare
you assume you have a 'British sense of humour' when
you rule out this BBC gem. I'm afraid the British
press, the 'posh' press eg. the Independent, the
Guardian, the Times don't, unfortunately for u don't
agree with your pathetic verses on Marc Wooton's
brilliant creation! I have to say not only are you
severely retarded, you also seem to be completely
blind! In the princess Diana sketch, the audience was
not crying with sadness fool, they were crying with
laughter!@££ From the very beginning of the programme,
most people realised he was a fraud! If you connot
recognise the expressions on peoples faces or read
what mood generally people are experiencing, GET HELP
YOU WANKER! Why don't you jump off a bridge you TWAT!
Pathetic. Don't bother to reply you nonce! I'd expect
the same dribble!@!

yours sincerley

Chris

I recently received this email from a British Wanker, er, I mean British Reader (at least I think he's British, it's not hard to throw around the words "wanker" and "twat") who disagreed with my review and rebuffed me soundly with his intellectual arguments and capital letters.

Which is fine. Humor is subjective. I don't see how you can call Shirley Ghostman's ideas a "brilliant creation" when honestly his pranks don't have any real wit to them. I guess I haven't watched everything he's done but what I did see was painful to watch. There are those comedians who can improvise funny material on the spot and there are those who try--Shirley Ghostman tries.

I did say that possibly part of what was unfunny was that the humor was based on embarrassment. That's not the best analysis since The Office is based on dark, uncomfortable humor where everyone is embarrassed for their boss and I love The Office. But the focal point there is the Boss and the humor is planned and well written. When you embarrass an individual in real life it's a different set up. You have to be careful. Your audience may empathize with the individual being pranked so if the prank is intentionally cruel it may not come off as funny. Pranks can be done well, I just don't think Shirley Ghostman did anything worth filming. It was of interest, but not entertaining.

And as far as the audience being in on the joke, yes, most of the audience was eventually getting it that this was a put-on, but there obviously were some, that unless they were faking their expressions of surprise and shock, who were psychic believers. It's also possible with editing that someone who was crying from laughter was made to look like they were crying from sadness--I'll grant that but then that was the intent of the editor and not my fault if I was using their interpretation of the events. In the end though there had to be believers in the audience. Otherwise what would be the point of Shirley Ghostman doing his stunts? The whole goal is to punk psychic believers. If everyone is in on the joke, there is no joke. And of course when he was off stage people were not in on the joke either or he would not have been welcomed.

And lastly, the old nonsense about you can't have a British sense of humor if you're not British, well that's why it's called a"British Sense of humor". It's a reference to the ability to laugh and appreciate British Comedies--but not all of them. Also if Shirley Ghostman is so brilliant then why did he name his show after an existing movie directed by Neil Jordan (a Brit) thinking that it was a clever pun that no one else had thought of? Being that I didn't like that movie everytime I saw High Spirits on the TV Guide I skipped it. I only found High Spirits by looking in the On Demand section under BBC America.

Maybe there is an audience for this show, I never recommend trusting one opinion. My main beef is that it just wasn't funny. And much of the humor came off as cruel towards harmless individuals which I'm not a big fan of unless the individual is in the popular media or is somehow deserving of the prank. The psychics deserved to be pranked but I view those who go to pyschics as victims. It's hard to see a victim pranked and laugh. Maybe that's just me or maybe it really all comes down to that this show idea could have worked if it was done by a better comedian. If anyone else has some opinions send them on in. I don't mind being called a wanker. It's a bit of verbal jousting which energizes your day.


Return to Main Menu